CAT VARC: 25 RC Drills That Raise Accuracy Fast

VARC is weird.

One day you are cruising at 80 percent accuracy, feeling like you have cracked the code. Next day, same kind of passage, and suddenly you are second guessing obvious lines and choosing the most “CAT-ish” option. Which, of course, is wrong.

If you are preparing for the CAT exam, you already know this. VARC is not just English; it is decision making under time pressure, with traps set to mislead you.

So this post is not going to be motivational. It is a drill list. A training plan.

These are 25 Reading Comprehension drills I have seen actually move the needle, especially for people stuck in the 60 to 75 percent accuracy zone. Some drills are small and boring. Some feel uncomfortable. That is the point. You want your brain to stop doing random things in RC and start doing repeatable things.

Use these drills with any RC source—previous year CAT passages, quality mocks, good editorials. Mix and match.

Also, quick note: if you are still figuring out which coaching or test series fits you, MBA Entrance Exam Guide by GOALisB is a practical place to compare institutes by exam, city, fees, faculty, reviews, and then book a counseling or demo. No big speeches, just decision support.

If you're considering options other than CAT for MBA entrance exams, it's worth exploring alternative routes such as getting into IIM without CAT, or understanding the differences between GMAT and CAT through resources like GMAT vs CAT.

For those interested in the upcoming CAT exam date or specifics about the CAT exam 2023, GOALisB has comprehensive guides available.

Alright. Drills.

Before you start: one rule that makes drills work

Do not “solve” RC like it is a quiz. Solve it like it is a skill.

That means every drill needs two parts:

1. Attempt

2. Review, in writing

Yes, writing. Even if it is messy. Even if it is in shorthand.

If you are not reviewing, you are basically doing cardio and calling it strength training.

Drill 1: The 60 second passage scan (no questions)

What you do: Set a timer for 60 seconds. Read the passage once, fast but not careless. Stop. Do not look at questions.

What you write (15 seconds):

• Topic in 5 to 8 words

• Author’s main point in 1 line

• Tone in 1 word (skeptical, admiring, critical, neutral, etc.)

Why it helps: Stops you from drowning in details. Forces you to form a top down map early.

Drill 2: One sentence per paragraph

What you do: After reading, write one sentence per paragraph. Not summary of the whole passage. Paragraph wise.

Rule: Your sentence must start with one of these:

• “The author says…”

• “This paragraph argues…”

• “This paragraph sets up…”

Why it helps: CAT questions love paragraph roles. If you can label roles, “primary purpose” and “flow” questions become easier.

Drill 3: The “because” rewrite

What you do: Take the author’s main claim and rewrite it as:

The author believes X because Y.

Then add one more because if the passage supports it.

Example format: The author believes modern conservation fails because it separates humans from ecosystems, because policy treats people as threats rather than participants.

Why it helps: Most wrong options are claims without the correct “because”. This drill builds evidence linking.

Drill 4: Highlight only transitions

What you do: Re read the passage but only underline transition words:

• however, therefore, although, for instance, in contrast, moreover, nevertheless, etc.

Then: Write the skeleton in 3 to 4 lines using only those transitions.

Why it helps: Makes the logical flow visible. CAT traps often flip contrast or conditional statements.

Drill 5: Extreme word detector

What you do: In each option, circle extreme words:

• always, never, completely, only, must, proves, impossible, entirely

Then ask: did the passage really go that far?

Why it helps: Over time you stop falling for “strong sounding” options that overshoot the passage.

Drill 6: Elimination first, selection later

What you do: For each question, do not choose the answer immediately. First eliminate two options with reasons.

Write tiny reasons like:

• “Opposite tone”

• “Too broad”

• “Not in passage”

• “Distorts cause”

Why it helps: Accuracy improves when you stop hunting for the “right” option and start killing wrong ones.

Drill 7: Two line evidence rule

What you do: For every correct answer (after review), write:

• Evidence line 1

• Evidence line 2

If you cannot find two supporting bits, your correctness may be accidental.

Why it helps: Builds discipline. Also exposes when you are using gut feel.

Drill 8: Question type tagging

What you do: After every RC set, tag each question as:

• Main idea

• Inference

• Tone/attitude

• Specific detail

• Function/role

• Strengthen/weaken (rare but happens)

• Application (new scenario)

Then: Track accuracy by type.

Why it helps: Most people are bad at one or two types and don’t know it. Fixing becomes targeted.

Drill 9: The “wrong because” journal

What you do: Maintain a list of wrong answers with one line:

I chose B because I assumed ___, but passage says ___.

Keep it brutally honest.

Why it helps: Your errors repeat. Like, weirdly repeat. This journal reveals your personal patterns.

Drill 10: Blind attempt, then open book

What you do: Attempt RC normally under time.

Then do a second round where you are allowed to go back and “open book” verify each answer, no time pressure.

Compare:

• Which ones changed?

• Why did you change?

• Were your original choices overconfident or underconfident?

Why it helps: Shows whether your issue is comprehension or pressure.

Drill 11: Time split experiment (4-4 vs 3-5)

What you do: Try two different time splits on similar difficulty passages:

• Method A: 4 minutes read, 4 minutes questions

• Method B: 3 minutes read, 5 minutes questions

Track which gives better accuracy.

Why it helps: Some people need more reading time. Some need more option evaluation time. Stop copying toppers, find your split.

Drill 12: Read with a “role” lens

What you do: While reading, label each paragraph mentally:

• Context

• Problem

• Claim

• Evidence

• Counterargument

• Limitation

• Conclusion

Even if your labels are not perfect.

Why it helps: RC becomes structured. Especially useful for abstract passages.

Drill 13: Counterargument hunt

What you do: Find the one place where the author:

• admits a limitation

• acknowledges an opposing view

• says “some argue…”

Write it down.

Why it helps: Inference questions often revolve around that pivot area.

Drill 14: Tone proof

What you do: If a question is about tone, do not answer until you have found two tone markers in the passage.

Markers can be:

• adjectives (flawed, admirable, dubious)

• verbs (undermines, celebrates, dismisses)

• qualifiers (somewhat, arguably)

Why it helps: Tone mistakes are usually vibes. This forces proof.

Drill 15: Abstract to concrete translation

What you do: Pick two dense sentences from the passage. Rewrite each in plain language as if explaining to a 12 year old.

Not shorter. Just clearer.

Why it helps: CAT loves dense academic writing. Translating trains true understanding.

Drill 16: Title the passage in 7 words

What you do: After reading, create a title in exactly 7 words.

Example: “Why museums distort history more than teach”.

Why it helps: Main idea clarity. Also helps with central theme questions.

Drill 17: Option paraphrase before choosing

What you do: Before selecting, paraphrase the option in your own words. Especially for the final two options.

If paraphrasing exposes nonsense, eliminate it.

Why it helps: Options are written to sound intelligent. Paraphrasing removes the glamour.

Drill 18: The “scope boundary” check

What you do: For each question, define the scope in one phrase:

• “This passage focuses on X in Y context.”

Then check options for:

• too broad (talks about all societies, passage talks about one period)

• too narrow (uses one example as the whole point)

• wrong domain (brings in economics when passage is about ethics)

Why it helps: Scope errors are the most common in CAT RC. Understanding these errors can significantly improve your CAT percentiles for IIM interview calls.

Drill 19: Inference ladder (safe, risky, wild)

What you do: For inference questions, classify each option:

• Safe inference (directly supported)

• Risky inference (plausible but not supported)

• Wild leap (sounds smart but not grounded)

Pick only safe.

Why it helps: Your brain likes risky. CAT punishes risky.

Drill 20: One passage, three retells (30 seconds each)

What you do: After reading, do three quick retells:

1. Retell to a friend who doesn’t care (simple)

2. Retell to a professor (precise)

3. Retell to yourself in 1 line (brutal compression)

Why it helps: Flexes comprehension. If you can’t retell, you didn’t understand.

Drill 21: Locate the “author vs narrator” boundary

What you do: Identify lines that are:

• general background info

• other people’s views

• author’s actual stance

Write: “Author agrees here” or “Author only reports here”.

Why it helps: Many wrong answers assume the author believes everything mentioned. Nope.

Drill 22: Passage map with arrows

What you do: Create a map like:

• P1 sets context ->

• P2 problem ->

• P3 author claim ->

• P4 evidence ->

• P5 implication

Use arrows. Keep it ugly.

Why it helps: Improves navigation. When you go back for details, you know where to look.

Drill 23: 3 question cap drill (for overthinkers)

What you do: Pick an RC passage. Attempt only 3 questions, then stop. Review those deeply.

Next day, attempt remaining questions.

Why it helps: Overthinkers burn accuracy by fatigue and spiraling. This drill builds quality first.

Drill 24: Negative marking simulation (mental)

What you do: In practice, treat wrong answers as emotionally expensive. Literally write:

• Correct: +3

• Wrong: -1

• Net score: ___

Then set a target: “I will attempt fewer questions but net higher.”

Why it helps: Stops random guessing culture. Accuracy climbs because selection becomes intentional.

Drill 25: The “one reason I rejected each option” review

What you do: After checking solutions, revisit the question and write for A B C D:

• Rejected A because __

• Rejected B because __

• Rejected C because __

• Correct D because __

Even if it takes 2 minutes.

Why it helps: This is the fastest way to learn option patterns. Also exposes when you got it right for the wrong reason.

You do not need to do all 25. Please don’t.

Here are three simple drill stacks you can rotate.

Stack 1 (accuracy first, 30 to 40 minutes)

• Drill 1 (60 second scan)

• Drill 2 (one sentence per paragraph)

• Drill 6 (elimination first)

• Drill 7 (two line evidence)

Stack 2 (inference and tone, 30 minutes)

• Drill 13 (counterargument hunt)

• Drill 14 (tone proof)

• Drill 19 (inference ladder)

• Drill 21 (author vs narrator)

Stack 3 (exam simulation with learning, 45 minutes)

• Attempt 2 passages timed

• Drill 10 (blind then open book)

• Drill 25 (reject each option)

Do this 4 to 6 days a week and you will feel the shift. Not instantly. But you will start seeing traps earlier, and that is basically VARC growth.

Drills work best when your material quality is high. If you are using random RC from random PDFs, you might train on bad questions.

If you are confused about where to get good mocks, which coaching is worth paying for, or you want something city specific, check MBA Entrance Exam Guide by GOALisB at https://mbaentrance.goalisb.com/. You can compare institutes, filter by CAT, fees, faculty strength, and read reviews, then book a free counseling or demo class. Even if you do self prep, having clarity on resources is half the battle.

RC accuracy goes up when your process becomes boring.

Boring as in repeatable. You read, you map, you eliminate, you justify. You stop guessing. You stop arguing with the passage. You stop trying to be clever.

Pick 6 to 8 drills from this list. Do them for two weeks. Track accuracy by question type. Keep a wrong because journal. Then adjust.

That is it. That is the whole game.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

What makes the VARC section in CAT exam challenging?

VARC is challenging because it involves decision making under time pressure with traps designed to mislead you. It's not just about English proficiency but also about strategic thinking and avoiding common pitfalls.

How can reading comprehension drills improve my VARC accuracy for CAT?

Reading comprehension drills train your brain to adopt repeatable strategies rather than random guessing. They help improve focus, logical flow understanding, evidence linking, and elimination skills, especially beneficial for those stuck in the 60-75% accuracy range.

What is the importance of reviewing RC drills in writing?

Reviewing in writing is crucial because it transforms practice from mere repetition (cardio) into effective skill-building (strength training). Writing helps solidify understanding, clarify reasoning, and identify mistakes for targeted improvement.

Can you explain the '60 second passage scan' drill and its benefits?

In this drill, you read a passage quickly within 60 seconds without looking at questions, then write down the topic in 5-8 words, the author's main point in one line, and the tone in one word. This helps prevent drowning in details and encourages forming a top-down map early on.

How does highlighting transition words help in solving RC passages?

Highlighting transitions like 'however,' 'therefore,' or 'although' reveals the logical flow of the passage. Understanding these connections helps avoid traps that flip contrast or conditional statements, improving comprehension and answer accuracy.

What strategy should I use when selecting answers to RC questions?

Adopt an elimination-first approach: instead of immediately choosing an answer, first eliminate two clearly wrong options with brief reasons (e.g., 'Opposite tone,' 'Too broad'). This method increases accuracy by focusing on removing incorrect choices before selecting the right one.

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What makes the VARC section in CAT exam challenging?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"VARC is challenging because it involves decision making under time pressure with traps designed to mislead you. It's not just about English proficiency but also about strategic thinking and avoiding common pitfalls."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How can reading comprehension drills improve my VARC accuracy for CAT?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Reading comprehension drills train your brain to adopt repeatable strategies rather than random guessing. They help improve focus, logical flow understanding, evidence linking, and elimination skills, especially beneficial for those stuck in the 60-75% accuracy range."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What is the importance of reviewing RC drills in writing?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Reviewing in writing is crucial because it transforms practice from mere repetition (cardio) into effective skill-building (strength training). Writing helps solidify understanding, clarify reasoning, and identify mistakes for targeted improvement."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can you explain the '60 second passage scan' drill and its benefits?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In this drill, you read a passage quickly within 60 seconds without looking at questions, then write down the topic in 5-8 words, the author's main point in one line, and the tone in one word. This helps prevent drowning in details and encourages forming a top-down map early on."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How does highlighting transition words help in solving RC passages?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Highlighting transitions like 'however,' 'therefore,' or 'although' reveals the logical flow of the passage. Understanding these connections helps avoid traps that flip contrast or conditional statements, improving comprehension and answer accuracy."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What strategy should I use when selecting answers to RC questions?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Adopt an elimination-first approach: instead of immediately choosing an answer, first eliminate two clearly wrong options with brief reasons (e.g., 'Opposite tone,' 'Too broad'). This method increases accuracy by focusing on removing incorrect choices before selecting the right one."}}]}